×
100 316
Fashion Jobs
ULTA BEAUTY, INC.
Retail Sales Manager
Permanent · Beavercreek
ULTA BEAUTY, INC.
Retail Operations Manager
Permanent · Meridian charter Township
ULTA BEAUTY, INC.
co - Sales Manager
Permanent · Henderson
L'OREAL GROUP
Account Executive - Skinceuticals (North Alabama)
Permanent · Birmingham
L'OREAL GROUP
Manager/Associate Principle Engineer-Packaging
Permanent · Clark
L'OREAL GROUP
Manager Data Quality
Permanent · Clark
L'OREAL GROUP
Finance Analyst (Retail Store Operations)
Permanent · Saint Petersburg
L'OREAL GROUP
Manager, PR & Influencer - Essie Global Marketing
Permanent · New York
SALLY BEAUTY CORPORATE
District Manager
Permanent · Syracuse
KOHLS
Full-Time Loss Prevention Supervisor
Permanent · Elizabethtown
KOHLS
Full-Time Loss Prevention Officer
Permanent · Cerritos
KOHLS
Full-Time Loss Prevention Officer
Permanent · Cherry Hill
KOHLS
Full-Time Loss Prevention Supervisor
Permanent · Highland
MACY'S
Asset Protection Detective, Mall at Prince Georges - Full Time
Permanent · Hyattsville
MACY'S
Manager, Recruitment Operations
Permanent · Tampa
L BRANDS
Lead Asset Protection Officer - Broad st , 2nd Shift (3pm-11pm)
Permanent · Reynoldsburg
H&M
Digital Product Owner
Permanent · Secaucus
BLOOMINGDALE'S
Registry Consultant, Roosevelt Field - Part Time
Permanent · Garden City
BLOOMINGDALE'S
Registry Consultant, North Michigan - Full Time
Permanent · Chicago
BLOOMINGDALE'S
Trade Area Asset Protection Manager, Northern California
Permanent · San Jose
BLOOMINGDALE'S
Registry Consultant, Roosevelt Field - Full Time
Permanent · Garden City
ROSS STORES
Store Protection Specialist
Permanent · Colorado Springs
By
Reuters
Published
Jun 23, 2020
Reading time
2 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-

J&J loses bid to overturn baby powder verdict, but damages cut to $2.12 billion

By
Reuters
Published
Jun 23, 2020

A Missouri appeals court on Tuesday rejected Johnson & Johnson’s bid to throw out a jury verdict in favor of women who blamed their ovarian cancer on its baby powder and other talc products, but reduced damages by more than half to $2.12 billion (1.69 billion pounds).


Photo: Reuters



The Missouri Court of Appeals lowered the original $4.69 billion verdict from July 2018 after dismissing claims by some of the 22 women and their families who sued.

But it said the plaintiffs proved that J&J and an affiliate concealed for decades that its talc products contained asbestos, “worked tirelessly” to ensure that testing protocols would not detect asbestos in all talc samples, and published articles downplaying the safety hazards of talc.

“Plaintiffs proved with convincing clarity that defendants engaged in outrageous conduct because of an evil motive or reckless indifference,” the court said. “There was significant reprehensibility in defendants’ conduct.”

J&J pledged to appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court.

“This was a fundamentally flawed trial, grounded in a faulty presentation of the facts,” spokeswoman Kim Montagnino said. “We deeply sympathize with anyone suffering from cancer, which is why the facts are so important. We remain confident that our talc is safe, asbestos free, and does not cause cancer.”

Tuesday’s decision followed J&J’s May 19 announcement that it would stop selling its talc Baby Powder in the United States and Canada.

The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company faces more than 19,000 lawsuits claiming that its talc products caused cancer because of contamination from asbestos, a known carcinogen.

J&J’s damages payout in Tuesday’s decision include $500 million of compensatory damages and $1.62 billion of punitive damages, down from a respective $550 million and $4.14 billion in the original verdict from a Missouri circuit court.

Mark Lanier, the lead lawyer for plaintiffs, called the decision “a clarion call for J&J to try and find a good way to resolve the cases for the people who have been hurt.”

J&J has faced intense scrutiny of its baby powder’s safety following a 2018 Reuters investigative report that found it knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its talc.

Internal company records, trial testimony and other evidence show that from at least 1971 to the early 2000s, J&J's raw talc and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos.

© Thomson Reuters 2021 All rights reserved.