×
36 785
Fashion Jobs
OLD NAVY
General Manager - Pico Rivera
Permanent · Pico Rivera
OLD NAVY
Creative Director - Loyalty & CRM
Permanent · San Francisco
OLD NAVY
Assistant General Manager, Customer Operations - Easton Market
Permanent · Columbus
L’ORÉAL GROUP
Manager/sr Manager, Campus Recruiting
Permanent · New York
L’ORÉAL GROUP
Senior Manager / Manager of Brand Marketing
Permanent · Jersey City
KOHLS
Product Manager - Payment System
Permanent · Menomonee Falls
KOHLS
Full-Time Loss Prevention Officer
Permanent · Framingham
KOHLS
Full-Time Loss Prevention Officer
Permanent · Massapequa
L.L.BEAN INC.
rd Shift Bike Boat And Ski Sales Representative
Permanent · Freeport
L.L.BEAN INC.
Sales Representative
Permanent · King of Prussia
L.L.BEAN INC.
Hunting And Fishing Sales Representative
Permanent · Freeport
L.L.BEAN INC.
Sales Representative
Permanent · Hadley
L.L.BEAN INC.
Sales Representative
Permanent · Fayetteville
ALICE AND OLIVIA
Sales Supervisor - Austin
Permanent · Austin
ALICE AND OLIVIA
E-Commerce Customer Service Manager
Permanent · New York
JCPENNEY
Business Support Specialist - Communications
Permanent · Plano
JCPENNEY
Buyer - Home (Entertaining & Tabletop)
Permanent · Plano
JCPENNEY
Multi District Human Resources Business Partner
Permanent · Jefferson City
JCPENNEY
Product Manager - Customer Account & Loyalty
Permanent · Plano
TIFFANY & CO
Inventory Control Analyst
Permanent · Parsippany-Troy Hills
ULTA BEAUTY
Salon Manager-Hickory Point Mall
Permanent · Forsyth
ULTA BEAUTY
Salon Manager-White Marlin Mall
Permanent · Ocean City

Latest trial in J&J talc litigations gets under way in California

By
Reuters
Published
today Jan 9, 2019
Reading time
access_time 3 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-

A California jury on Monday heard opening statements in the latest trial over allegations that Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products, including the company’s baby powder, were contaminated with asbestos and cause cancer.


Reuters



The lawsuit brought by Terry Leavitt in Alameda Superior Court in Oakland is the first of over a dozen J&J talc cases scheduled for trial in 2019. The company is facing some 11,700 lawsuits over the safety of talc in its products.

Leavitt’s lawyer, Joseph Satterley, accused J&J in his opening statement of knowingly selling a dangerous product, according to an online broadcast by Courtroom View Network. “The evidence will show that J&J knew about the asbestos risk and they continued to sell the product, giving consumers no opportunity to protect themselves,” he said.

A lawyer for co-defendant Imerys Talc America, a unit of French Imerys SA, told the jury the evidence would show there is no asbestos in its talc and that Leavitt’s disease was not caused by its product.

A lawyer for J&J will make his opening remarks on Tuesday.

“Our talc is safe and does not contain asbestos. For decades, Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder has repeatedly been tested and been found not to contain asbestos,” the company said in response to a request for comment on Monday.

J&J and Imerys have argued in court that decades of studies have shown their products to be safe and asbestos-free.

Leavitt’s is the first talc case to go to trial since Reuters on Dec. 14 published a special report detailing internal J&J documents showing talc in the company’s raw and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos from the 1970s into the early 2000s.

The report prompted a stock selloff on fears of J&J’s liability. Shares on Monday closed at $127.01, 14 percent below their Dec. 13 value.

While earlier talc lawsuits alleged talc itself causes ovarian cancer, plaintiffs’ lawyers have more recently focused on arguing that asbestos contamination in talc caused mesothelioma, a form of cancer linked to asbestos exposure.

Leavitt’s case is being tried by the same team of lawyers, including Satterley, who in April 2018 won a $117 million award by a New Jersey jury for a man who blamed his mesothelioma on J&J’s cosmetic talc. That verdict is under appeal.

In 11 cases so far alleging asbestos contamination in talc, three resulted in wins for plaintiffs, awarding damages as high as $4.69 billion in a July 2018 multi-plaintiff ovarian cancer verdict. J&J won three other cases and another five ended in hung juries. J&J has appealed all of the plaintiff verdicts, and the company said it is confident the verdicts would be overturned on appeal.

Leavitt was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2017.
She was born in the Philippines and claims she was exposed to J&J cosmetic talc that originated from South Korea mines during the first two years of her life before her parents moved back to the United States in 1968, Satterley said on Monday. He said testing of Asian talc samples from the 1960s and 1970s by his own expert would show Korean-mined talc tested positive for asbestos fibers, as has talc from U.S. sources.

J&J in court filings in the Leavitt case said that fibers found in the Korean talc or any of its other cosmetic talc could not be classified as asbestos and referred to them as non-asbestos forms that its experts say are harmless.

Geologically, some asbestos can occur as “non-asbestiform” rocks. Both forms often occur together and in talc deposits.

The company in its Monday statement did not specifically address the allegations surrounding the South Korean mine.

© Thomson Reuters 2019 All rights reserved.