×
78 317
Fashion Jobs
NIKE
Senior Software Engineer ii - Business Planning & Consolidation
Permanent · Beaverton
NIKE
Special Assets – Governance Operations Senior Manager
Permanent · Beaverton
ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH CO.
Director, Digital Product Management (Remote)
Permanent · Columbus
TAPESTRY
Manager, Account Executive
Permanent · New York
JOCKEY
Merchandise Planner
Permanent · Kenosha
JOCKEY
Global Supply Chain Planning Manager
Permanent · Kenosha
SALLY BEAUTY CORPORATE
Outside Sales Representative -Cosmoprof
Permanent · Boston
SALLY BEAUTY CORPORATE
Outside Sales Representative
Permanent · Wichita
NORDSTROM INC
Manager - Asset Protection - Downtown Seattle Rack
Permanent · Seattle
ATHLETA
Assistant General Manager - Mall of America
Permanent · Bloomington
OLD NAVY
Assistant General Manager - Fremaux tc
Permanent · Slidell
BLOOMINGDALE'S
Registry Consultant, Full Time: 59th Street
Permanent · New York
ALICE AND OLIVIA
Business Systems Analyst – Wholesale
Permanent · New York
LEVI'S
Retention Marketing Manager - Beyond Yoga
Permanent · Culver City
LEVI'S
Senior Manager, Business Analytics - Beyond Yoga
Permanent · Culver City
LEVI'S
Senior Manager, Direct Mail Marketing - Beyond Yoga
Permanent · Culver City
RALPH LAUREN
Associate Manager Merchandise
Permanent · Bluffton
MACY'S
Manager, Business Administration
Permanent · Bay Shore
MACY'S
Asset Protection Detective, Quaker Bridge Mall - Part Time
Permanent · Lawrence Township
MACY'S
Asset Protection Detective, Dadeland - Full Time
Permanent · Miami
MACY'S
Asset Protection Detective, Garden State Plaza - Full Time
Permanent · Paramus
MACY'S
Asset Protection Detective, Gurnee Mills - Part Time
Permanent · Gurnee
By
AFP
Published
Oct 31, 2016
Reading time
3 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-

On Halloween, the US Supreme Court ponders costumes

By
AFP
Published
Oct 31, 2016

In a happy coincidence of the US judicial calendar, the Supreme Court on Halloween Monday is set to solemnly take up the subject of costumes and outfits.

The eight justices have been asked to define copyright limits in an usual case that poses the question: Can the design of a cheerleader's outfit be protected by rights of authorship?


Varsity



The dispute is more substantive than it appears, pitting Star Athletica against Varsity Brands, both manufacturers of clothing for young athletes -- or in this case cheerleaders.

A beloved feature of the US sporting scene, cheerleaders have been exciting fans at American football, baseball and other games for more than 120 years.

Varsity, the market leader, accuses its smaller rival Star Athletica of copying certain of its cheerleader costumes.

According to federal law, a design can be protected by copyright if it can be distinguished as separate from the article's function.

In this case, Varsity insists that the chevron pattern on the tops and skirts of its cheerleading outfits is a conceptual creation separate from the uniform's function. Star Athletica maintains the opposite.

The court's challenge will be to draw the line between the aesthetic and utilitarian, creating a framework for deciding whether a copyright for design is valid.

- 'Cosplayers' worried -

The decision could have broad repercussions with significant economic consequences.

The dispute is particularly concerning to devotees of "cosplay," who dress up in costumes that borrow from characters in Japanese manga comics, video games and other spheres.

Cosplayers often appropriate costume elements that could be legally protected: uniforms, military insignias, logos and so on. They fear the Supreme Court may squelch their creative freedom.

Philip Gust, president of the International Costumers Guild, says costumers tap into design elements that are common to all kinds of genre -- sci-fi/fantasy, comics, anime and historical garments.

"Suppose that Desilu Studios tried to protect the original Star Trek costumes by copyrighting every conceivable type and arrangement of sleeve braid and geometric insignia shapes on the three solid colors used for the shirts in the series," he said.

"Every sci-fi space pilot from Buck Rogers to Battle Star Galactica has similar elements," he said.

"Varsity is trying to treat arrangements of geometrical shapes that just happen to be the ones on cheerleading costumes as separable works of art, but in fact, they're no more separable than the elements of the Star Trek shirt," he said. "Mondrian must be rolling in his grave."

- The Royal Manticoran Navy -

Sudan Scafidi, founder of the Fashion Law Institute at Fordham University's law school, disagrees.

For her, the real danger is that the Supreme Court will weaken "the little bit of copyright protection that US law offers to fashion."

She notes that US copyright law protects fabric patterns but not the three dimensional costumes themselves, and then only original creations.

"There is zero possibility that this case -- or any proposed change in US copyright law -- would affect access to common elements of a fashion genre or to historical costumes, which are already in the public domain," she said.

"A costume designer who wants to recreate a medieval knight or a 1920s flapper is and will remain free to do so, no matter what the Supreme Court decides."

Supreme Court cases generally feature two antagonists, each backed up by their "amicis," from the Latin phrase for "friends of the court," who submit briefs arguing for or against one side or another.

Among those submitting briefs in this case is The Royal Manticoran Navy (TRMN), a fan club inspired by David Webber's Honor Harrington science-fiction series.

Members organize themselves in hierarchical fashion, dressing in a variety of nautical uniforms.

"This issue is larger than just cheerleading uniforms, and can have an impact well beyond the main parties in the case," said the fan club's president and chairman Martin Lessem.

Copyright © 2022 AFP. All rights reserved. All information displayed in this section (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presses.