100 875
Fashion Jobs
FASHION PERSONNEL
Marketing & Merchandising Manager
Permanent · NEW YORK
KOHLS
Corporate Security Officer - 2nd Shift
Permanent · MENOMONEE FALLS
KOHLS
Full-Time Loss Prevention Supervisor
Permanent · SPRINGFIELD
KOHLS
Full-Time Stockroom Operations Supervisor
Permanent · BOZEMAN
KOHLS
Part-Time Loss Prevention Service Specialist
Permanent · CHRISTIANSBURG
ABBOTT
Senior Quality Engineer
Permanent · SCARBOROUGH
ABBOTT
R&D Project Manager
Permanent · ALAMEDA
ABBOTT
Counsel, Commercial
Permanent · AUSTIN
VARSITY BRANDS
Field Sales Professional- Missoula, Montana
Permanent · WASHINGTON
VARSITY BRANDS
Field Sales Professional- Missouri, kc
Permanent · WASHINGTON
UNILEVER
HR Manufacturing People Partner/HR Generalist And Employee Relations Specialist
Permanent · SIKESTON
SACK OFF 5TH
sr. Manager, Editorial Content
Permanent · NEW YORK
SACK OFF 5TH
Asset Protection Guard
Permanent · PHILADELPHIA
SACK OFF 5TH
Asset Protection Investigator
Permanent · NEW YORK
FABLETICS
Art Director (Womens)
Permanent · EL SEGUNDO
ADIDAS
Manager Buying, Trading And Allocation Ltd
Permanent · PORTLAND
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS
ae - Merchandise Leader (Part-Time) - us
Permanent · SALEM
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS
Aerie - Merchandise Leader (Part-Time) - us
Permanent · ANNAPOLIS
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS
ae - Merchandise Leader (Part-Time) - us
Permanent · PHILADELPHIA
GAP INC.
sr. Manager, Digital & Tech Finance
Permanent · SAN FRANCISCO
OLD NAVY
Assistant General Manager - Aurora Center
Permanent · FAIRBANKS
CROCS
Heydude: Sales Manager, Latam
Permanent ·
Published
Apr 30, 2017
Reading time
2 minutes
Download
Download the article
Print
Text size

Wyoming Senator reintroduces bill to create sales taxes for online sellers

Published
Apr 30, 2017

The United States Congress is currently exploring tax legislation for online sales, which according to National Retail Federation Senior Vice President for Government Affairs David French, has “stalled for far too long.”
 
US Senator of Wyoming Michael Enzi on Thursday reintroduced the Marketplace Fairness Act that would enable state governments to collect and use taxes from online retailers that do not have a physical presence. The legislation passed the Senate in 2013 but it never received a vote in the house.


 
South Dakota Representative Kristi Noem also reintroduced a House version of the Remote Transactions Parity Act that complements the Marketplace Fairness Act. Both measures would overturn a 1992 US Supreme Court ruling that out-of-state sellers can be required to collect taxes only if they have a physical presence such as a store, warehouse or office.
 
The ruling for Quill Corp. v. North Dakota in 1992 relied on a 1967 case, in which the court said a state could not require an out-of-state mail order seller to collect sales tax unless the seller had a physical presence. The ruling did not take into account a 1977 case that, according to Justice Anthony Kennedy and the NRF, established a “more recent and refined test” of whether tax should be collected.

Justice Kennedy said, “Given … changes in technology and consumer sophistication, it is unwise to delay any longer a reconsideration of the court’s holding. The legal system should find an appropriate case for this court to reexamine Quill.”
 
His comments came after a unanimous ruling in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Revenue that said federal courts should be allowed to hear a Direct Marketing Association lawsuit against a 2010 Colorado sales tax law. The law does not require out-of-state retailers to collect sales tax from Colorado customers, but requires untaxed purchases to be reported to state tax authorities.
 
“The Internet has caused far-reaching systemic and structural changes in the economy,” Kennedy said in 2015. “Although online businesses may not have a physical presence in some states, the web has, in many ways, brought the average American closer to most major retailers. A connection to a shopper’s favorite store is a click away regardless of how close or far the nearest storefront.”
 
Several bills were introduced over 15 years that could have overturned the Supreme Court ruling, and in November 2016, 11 states asked the court to reconsider the 1992 ruling. According to the NRF, states and local governments lose close to $25 billion a year because of untaxed online sales.

Copyright © 2024 FashionNetwork.com All rights reserved.